tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6287723589430614523.post797305452834785664..comments2023-04-11T18:06:18.528+03:00Comments on Limits of an Infinite Self: Patience, my love; one step at a time.the BCthhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/13608185584714061872noreply@blogger.comBlogger2125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6287723589430614523.post-647685719572917202010-01-25T22:27:11.882+02:002010-01-25T22:27:11.882+02:00Thanks, 13 Muluc. I read your piece, "Lost in...Thanks, 13 Muluc. I read your piece, "Lost in Translation," some while back, but I didn't think of it as I was writing this. Maybe some kernel from there found its way here, I don't know. What's becoming clear to me is that we are in fact all connected to one collective subconscious mind. The Internet isn't making that happen, but it's certainly helping to reveal the fact to us. The synchs in John Topp's piece and in the comment sections there are a wonderful example of thoughtforms propagating through the ether, and I see more almost every day.<br /><br />Namastéthe BCthhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/13608185584714061872noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6287723589430614523.post-48429752903999095632010-01-23T19:59:10.054+02:002010-01-23T19:59:10.054+02:00Thanks for sharing this, BCth. I know just what yo...Thanks for sharing this, BCth. I know just what you mean. I think you expressed it as well as anyone could. I too have felt frustrated by the way our language is not made for expressing multi-leveled meaning. It allows for talking about physical OR psychological OR symbolic events and realities but not all of them simultaneously. You can describe each level of meaning separately and then point out the eqivalency, but it is time consuming and somehow insufficient. The whole is more than the sum of it's parts, and the "more" gets lost when you split them up. It's a bit like representing a 3D object in 2D. No matter how skillfully you do it, you are still confined to a single point of view. I was trying to express something like this when I wrote "Lost in Translation" a while back. It ended up being so long, I had to do it in two parts and I still felt disappointed with the results. I think we are in the process of evolving towards a more integrated mode of awareness and a new kind of language will be required to manage it. One of the people on Evolver, John Topp, wrote a series on synchronicities around this theme. It's well worth checking out: " <a href="http://www.evolver.net/user/john_topp/blog/book_sky_part_1" rel="nofollow">The Book In The Sky</a>. I particularly like the title you chose for this post.<br />In Lak'echAmandahttps://www.blogger.com/profile/14203600454983599509noreply@blogger.com